For Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a pal - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of simple triggers about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, but it's also a bit repeated, and very verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And forum.batman.gainedge.org there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, greyhawkonline.com based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, because pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can order any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, honkaistarrail.wiki developed by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to widen his range, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human clients.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we really suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for innovative functions need to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really effective however let's develop it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have selected to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use developers' content on the internet to help establish their models, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and suvenir51.ru logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its finest carrying out industries on the vague promise of development."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely positive we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them accredit their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a national information library including public information from a large variety of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector forum.batman.gainedge.org required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to want the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a number of claims against AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training information and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a fraction of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, wiki-tb-service.com Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm uncertain how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.